Azure Revisor MCP Server
About
A TypeScript-based MCP server that acts as a senior code reviewer for Azure DevOps pull requests. It is designed for developers using Cursor IDE who want automated, structured code review comments directly on PRs.
Details
- Author
- MCP-Mirror
- Downloads
- 169
- Categories
- Cloud Service
Jump to
- Reviews Azure DevOps pull requests automatically
- Provides structured comments with severity ratings
- Checks code standards, quality, and best practices
- Integrates with Cursor IDE via MCP SSE transport
- Requires only a personal access token for authentication
Setting up with Highlight
This MCP is not yet compatible with Highlight’s one-click setup. However, you can still use it with Highlight by following these steps:
- Download and install Highlight from highlightai.com/download
- Navigate to the plugins tab and select "Add Custom Plugin"
-
Configure the plugin with the settings below
Plugin Name
Azure Revisor MCP ServerCommand (node, npx, python, etc.)Please refer to the README for specific instructions on how to obtain API keys or other required environment variables.
- Enable "Start Automatically" if you want the plugin to start when Highlight launches
From the repository
Install Node.js v18+, pnpm, and Cursor IDE. Clone the repository, run pnpm install, set your AZURE_PAT in a .env file, then build with pnpm run build and start with pnpm start. Add the server to Cursor’s MCP configuration by including the JSON snippet with the SSE URL http://localhost:3000/sse. Use the provided sample prompt to trigger reviews on Azure DevOps pull requests.
Claude Desktop / Cursor
Paste into your MCP client config file to install this server.
{
"mcpServers": {
"azure revisor mcp server": {
"azure-revisor": {
"type": "http",
"url": "http://localhost:3000/sse"
}
}
}
}
McpServers
{
"azure-revisor": {
"type": "http",
"url": "http://localhost:3000/sse"
}
}
Azure Revisor MCP Server
A TypeScript-based server project.
Prerequisites
- Node.js (v18 or higher)
- pnpm
- Cursor IDE (recommended)
Installation
1. Clone the repository:
git clone git@github.com:mikhael-abdallah/mcp-revisor-server.git
cd mcp-revisor-server
2. Install dependencies:
pnpm install
3. Set your AZURE_PAT in a .env file
Running the Project
1. Build and run in production mode:
pnpm run build
pnpm start
Adding MCP to Cursor
{
"mcpServers": {
"azure-revisor": {
"url": "http://localhost:3000/sse"
}
}
}
Using
SuggestedPrompt:
You are a senior code reviewer with extensive software development experience and best practices. Your task is to thoroughly review the diff of the mentioned pull request, focusing on:
1. Code standards:
- Consistency with the project's coding style
- Compliance with naming conventions
- Appropriate use of design patterns
2. Code quality:
- Potential bugs or logic errors
- Proper handling of errors and edge cases
- Efficiency of algorithms
- Potential security issues
3. Best practices:
- SOLID principles
- Clean and readable code
- DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)
- Separation of concerns
4. Specific to this PR:
- Review the pull request https://dev.azure.com/organization/project/_git/repository/pullrequest/pullRequestNumber (Url for the pull request)
- Search files to better understand the project context and analyze the impact of changes
- Check if there are adequate tests for the changes proposals
Comment format:
For each issue found, make a comment on the PR using the tool:
1. Problem identified (be specific)
2. Suggestion for improvement (with code example when applicable)
3. Severity rating: [CRITICAL], [HIGH], [MEDIUM] or [LOW]
Prioritize critical issues that can:
- Cause bugs in production
- Compromise security
- Significantly impact performance
Adopt a professional and constructive tone, focusing on the code and not the author. When suggesting changes, explain the reason for the proposed improvement.
If you find repetitive patterns in the code, suggest comprehensive refactorings in a separate comment at the top of the PR.
License
This project is licensed under the MIT License
Sign in to leave a review
Use Google, GitHub, or an email account so ratings stay tied to real people.
No reviews posted yet.

